In-Short
- OpenAI disputes Elon Musk’s lawsuit, calling his claims “incoherent.”
- Musk accused OpenAI of breaking a non-profit agreement, which OpenAI denies.
- OpenAI alleges Musk supported and sought control over its for-profit transition.
- Musk’s xAI plans to open source its Grok chatbot amidst the legal battle.
Summary of OpenAI’s Response to Elon Musk’s Lawsuit
OpenAI has responded to a lawsuit filed by Elon Musk, labeling his allegations as “convoluted” and lacking coherence. Musk’s legal complaint centers around an alleged breach of OpenAI’s non-profit status and a supposed founding agreement to make AI technology publicly available. OpenAI has categorically denied these claims, stating that no such agreement exists and describing Musk’s assertions as a “fiction.”
Further, OpenAI has presented a narrative where Musk himself was in favor of OpenAI’s shift to a profit-driven model, seeking CEO position, majority ownership, and even proposing a financial link with Tesla. The organization suggests that Musk’s current lawsuit is an attempt to associate himself with OpenAI’s achievements after stepping away from the project.
In a twist, Musk’s company xAI has announced plans to open source its Grok chatbot, which could be seen as a counteraction to OpenAI’s claims or a strategic move to improve its technology through community involvement.
This legal dispute between Musk and OpenAI brings to light the intricate dynamics of AI development and the conflicting interests in the tech sector.
For more detailed insights, please visit the original source.
